„I would grant the Church’s requested temporary injunction because California’s latest safety guidelines discriminate against places of worship and in favor of comparable secular businesses. Such discrimination violates the First Amendment,“ Kavanaugh wrote. „Absent a compelling justification (which the State has not offered), the State may not take a looser approach with, say, supermarkets, restaurants, factories, and offices while imposing stricter requirements on places of worship.“
Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch joined Kavanaugh’s dissent. The court’s late-night order says Justice Samuel Alito also dissented, but he did not sign on to Kavanaugh’s opinion.
The Supreme Court’s action on the California dispute came several hours after it turned down a bid by two Chicago-area churches for relief from stay-at-home orders Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker issued as part of an effort to control the spread of coronavirus.
The justices suggested the dispute was moot after Pritzker and other officials moved Thursday to make the previous limits on religious services voluntary instead of mandatory.
„The Illinois Department of Public Health issued new guidance on May 28. The denial is without prejudice to Applicants filing a new motion for appropriate relief if circumstances warrant,“ the court wrote in a brief order Friday evening.
The order appeared to be unanimous, as no justice publicly recorded any dissent.
The Romanian churches — one in Chicago and one just outside the city — took their complaints to the Supreme Court after being cited by local officials for violations of the lockdown orders. Lower courts declined emergency relief, but their lawsuits claiming that the orders violated the Constitution’s guarantees of freedom of religion remain pending.
Attorneys for the churches argued that their clients still urgently needed protection from an overbearing state government because there was no guarantee that the orders would not be reissued. However, the justices said the churches were free to come back if that transpired.
All the churches has asked the high court to act in time to allow for more expansive services this Sunday, which is the holiday of Pentecost.
While churches in various states have complained that the restrictions are excessive and unfairly put religion at a disadvantage to businesses like liquor stores, state officials have defended the measures by noting mass infections that have taken place at multiple churches across the U.S. and around the world.
Medical experts say the close contact of a typical church service, coupled with singing and loud talking, creates a major danger for the spread of droplets containing the virus.
Source: politico.com
See more here: news365.stream
